The Parable of the
Candle
by Garth Wiebe
https://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/1247.asp
Chris
and Lucy entered a building looking for Manuel. In a room they found a note and
a lighted candle. Chris looked at the note and read it aloud:
‘Hi! It’s 2:30, and I’m leaving to run some errands. I’ll be
back in a couple of hours. BTW, the electricity is out, so I lit a candle for
you. — Manuel.’
Then
Lucy said, ‘I know how we can find out how long it’s been since he left! Look,
the candle has been burning since he lit it and has a significant amount of wax
that’s melted and dripped down. If we figure out what the rate is which the wax
is melting and measure the amount of wax that has thus far dripped, we can work
backwards to find out how long it has been since he left.’
Chris
said, ‘Why waste your time? The note says he left at 2:30.’ Lucy said, ‘Don’t
believe everything you read.’ Chris replied, ‘Look, I’ve known Manuel for a
long time, and this is his handwriting. Don’t be ridiculous.’
Lucy
replied, ‘Ah yes, but what does he mean by “2:30”? A note like that is subject
to interpretation. Suppose he was talking about another time zone or
something.’ And so a short philosophical argument
ensued about the note. However, Lucy prevailed and insisted on performing the
measurement and calculations.
A few
minutes later, Lucy announced: ‘Well, I’ve got bad news for us. Based on the
amount of wax that has melted and the rate at which the wax is melting, I can
confidently tell you that it has been at least one whole day since this guy
left. He was probably talking about 2:30 yesterday. And since he said that he’d
be back “in a couple of hours”, we can assume that something happened to him
and he’s not coming back at all. So much for your “note”.’
Just
then, Manuel walked in. Lucy said, ‘Are you this guy “Manuel”? What took you so
long?’ Manuel replied, ‘What are you talking about? I left you guys a note
saying I’d be back in a couple of hours. It hasn’t even been that long.’ Lucy
said, ‘Never mind the note. I measured the amount of wax that has dripped off
your candle, and the rate which the wax was melting. I know you’ve been gone since
yesterday.’
Manuel
replied, ‘First of all, that candle isn’t burning anywhere near as brightly as
when I first lit it. Second of all, I didn’t light a
new candle, but a used one. And thirdly, I used another candle to light this
candle and in the process the wax from that candle spilled all over this one.’
Lucy
said, ‘So you set up that candle to deceive us, to make it look like you left
the room over a day ago, when in fact it’s been less than a couple of hours.’
Manuel replied, ‘Look, I left you a note telling you when I left. I never
intended for you to conduct some silly experiment measuring wax dripping off of
a candle to figure out when I left. I put the candle there so you guys would
have some light.’
Application:
Geographic: Fossils Yield 10-Million-Year-Old
Bone Marrow -- A First
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2006/0729ntn.asp
In June of 2005, scientists announced they
had found preserved red blood cells from a Tyrannosaurus
Rex leg bone. (http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/07/26/bone-marrow-found-intact-in-ancient-fossils/)
Findings
like this one illustrate the rigidity of the millions-of-years paradigm. Just
as in the case of the soft dinosaur tissue discovered awhile back, scientists
admit being shocked that tissues—in this case, bone
marrow of fossilized frogs and salamanders—could last so long. “It pushes back
the boundary for how far [soft tissue] fossilization can go,” according to the
study leader.
Of
course, there’s no real evidence that soft tissue can last that long; it’s
certainly not something scientists have demonstrated in a laboratory! One can
only swallow the idea that the tissues are millions of years old if one unyieldingly
presupposes that fossils take millions of years to develop and, therefore, that
these fossilized animals lived millions of years ago. To draw on The Parable of
the Candle a bit (go ahead; read it—I’ll wait), let’s say Lucy proceeds to
determine that the candle has been burning for at least a whole day. Then, on
the table next to the candle, she discovers a bowl full of cold ice cream. Yet
she unquestioningly believes, based on her estimate of how long the candle’s
been burning, that no one has been in the room in the past day. So instead of
allowing the bowl of ice cream to overturn her notion that no one’s been in the
room (and realizing that someone has been there rather recently!), she instead
remarks to Chris, “Well, this just shows you that ice cream can take an awfully
long time to melt!” Even if she doesn’t accept Manuel’s note that says he’s
only been gone since 2:30, the bowl of ice cream shows that someone had to have
been in the room recently with the bowl of ice cream, otherwise it would have
melted.