Same-Sex Marriage
By Stephen M. Golden
Copyright © March 11, 2012
Advocates of "same-sex marriage" claim
that not allowing two people of the same sex to marry is unfair,
discriminatory, and even unconstitutional.
They believe it is unfair discrimination against them in the same way
that blacks were denied their civil rights in the past. However, that claim is both false and
disingenuous.
Homosexual men and lesbian women have always had the
same right to marry as heterosexuals.
Men have the right to marry any woman who will have them. Women have the right to marry any man who
will have them. There is complete
equality. It is completely fair. There is no unfair discrimination. Nevertheless, what these advocates want is
not fairness and equality. What they
want is a creation of new special rights.
They want to re-define marriage.
The unclear mind might say, "I think a person
ought to have the right to marry whomever they love," and believe they
have made a compassionate, intelligent, and noble statement. However, such a person has failed to
comprehend the reality of marriage and lives on the edge of a virtual fantasy
world.
In the forefront, there are complications to such a
statement. Such reasoning can quickly
degenerate into absurdity.
What if a man loves two
women, three women, or even more? Why
should marriage be limited to only two people?
Should we condone multiple partners in marriage?
What if one wishes to
marry a sister or brother? One might
contend that such could lead to health problems in the children. It wouldn't if one of them were infertile, or
if they were the same sex. Besides, if
they love each other, it would be unfair to not allow it, right?
What if one wishes to
marry his or her father or mother? I mean, if they love each other
Do they need to be
adults? What if a High School teacher
wants to marry one of her sophomore students?
Why not? Maybe she could marry them
all.
Why limit it to
humans? If a person loves his or her dog
(or a sheep for that matter), shouldn't he or she be allowed to marry it? I know.
Ice Cream. If a person loves ice
cream, shouldn't that person be allowed to marry it?
Now we've reduced marriage to the first-grade humor
level, but I think my point is made.
Even a first grader knows marriage is more than a feeling you have with
someone or something you love. Marriage
means something. We have
to understand what marriage is.
Marriage is NOT simply a commitment between two
people who love each other. It is a moral reality. Marriage exists outside the constructs of any
governmental authority. It exists
whether a governmental authority recognizes it or not. It cannot be changed by laws a governmental
authority might pass. It is like the
relationship between parents and children.
A law cannot change the reality that a person is someone's son or
daughter, father or mother.
What is
marriage?
Whether the secularists and atheists among us like
it or not, marriage was established by God as One man, One woman, United
together for life. (Genesis 2:24;
Malachi 2:15; Matthew 19:5; Ephesians 5:31)
Nothing else is marriage. It's
something else.
In fact, many people think marriage is a ceremony in
which two people make a promise to each other.
A wedding. Marriage is NOT a
wedding. In the Jewish tradition of
Jesus' day, the marriage ceremony itself was when the man went to the woman's
father's house, and took her, with the father's blessing, into his own
home. There was a time of discretion. Then there was a celebration. As the tradition developed into more recent
times, as part the marriage celebration, the man takes the woman into another
room and consummates the marriage, often bringing out evidence of the
consummation to those at the marriage celebration. It was this consummation that constituted
marriage.
In God's eyes, two people are not married upon completion of a wedding ceremony. They are married when they unite. This is likely the origin of the Jewish
tradition mentioned above. When a man
and a woman unite sexually, in God's eyes, they are married. This may come as a shock to many Christians
who have had sexual relations at some time in their lives with someone who is
not their spouse. Yes, in God's eyes,
you are married to that person. That's
why many people are confused about God's statements on adultery. We have created our own definitions and
terminology. We have this concept of
"sex outside of marriage" and call it fornication. For God, "sexual relations outside of
marriage" is impossible. Therefore,
the first person with whom you have a sexual relation is your spouse;
subsequent relations are adultery. You
become "one" with whomever you have united your body. (1 Corinthians
5:16)
Now that we have a clearer understanding of what
marriage is, you should now be able to understand why "same-sex
marriage" is impossible. A man
cannot unite with a man; a woman cannot unite with a woman. To pretend that they can is a farce.
If I have two garden hoses and I take a male end and
a female end (there is a good reason they are called male and female), and
properly join them together, they are united together; they are
"married." If I take the two
male ends or the two female ends, it is impossible to unite them together. They cannot be "married."
For the governmental authority to recognize
"same-sex marriage," they are simply obscuring the moral reality of marriage. It's like duct-taping two male ends or two
female ends of a garden hose together.
To pretend that there can be such a thing as
"same-sex marriage" flies in the face of reality. It is lunacy.
It is impossible.